Home

Advertisement

Customize

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com

Mar. 9th, 2009

Protecting Dogma Over Life…

“Life must always be protected.”

 

Except if that life happens to be a pregnant girl, a pregnant nine year old girl, a pregnant nine year old girl carrying twins, a pregnant nine year old girl that will probably die if she carries the twins to term, a pregnant nine year old girl that will probably die if she carries the twins to term who was raped by her father.

 

A nine year old girl in Brazil was raped by, by some accounts perhaps since she was six years old, and was impregnated by her father. The girl recently underwent an abortion to terminate the pregnancy, and the Catholic Church has expressed outrage over the incident; not that the girl was raped but that she had an abortion.

 

According to an article in the New York Times the director of the public university hospital where the abortion was performed said that the pregnancy was in its fifteenth week, and the girl faced a serious health risks weighing only 80 pounds. According to the same article the lawyer for the Archdiocese of Olinda and Recife in northeastern Brazil said that the girl should have carried the twins to term and had a Caesarean section.

 

“Life must always be protected” is how according to the Belfast Telegraph a senior Vatican cleric has defended the Catholic Church's decision to excommunicate the mother and doctors of a nine-year-old rape victim who had the life-saving abortion.

 

If it was not outrageous enough that the Catholic Church would excommunicate those that saved the girls life, the Catholic Church has not decided to excommunicate the father. From the same Belfast Telegraph article:

 

Jose Cardoso Sobrinho, the conservative regional archbishop for Pernambuco where the girl was rushed to hospital, has said that the man would not be thrown out of the Church, because although he had allegedly committed "a heinous crime", the Church took the view that "the abortion, the elimination of an innocent life, was more serious".

 

Despite the Catholic Church having the foresight to be against the War in Iraq, and to contribute enormously to the cause of ending poverty, the Catholic Church has completely lost their moral bearings. It is exactly this type of intolerant stance that may actually push people away from Catholicism. This also illustrates how dangerous religion can be when it stands in the way of medicine and science.

 

In Brazil despite that abortion is illegal it is still common, especially among the poor. According to an article in Time an estimated 1 million women in Brazil have an abortion each year. The “poor are forced into clandestine clinics or take medication, while the better-off are treated by qualified physicians at well-appointed surgeries known to anyone with money and overlooked by colluding authorities.”

 

More than 200,000 women are treated in Brazilian hospitals every year for complications related to illegal abortions, one in three pregnancies in Brazil are unwanted, and one in seven women between the ages of 15 and 19 is a mother. However, the Catholic Church continues to ignore the realities. Like the anti-choice movement in the United States the Catholic Church in Brazil is more interested in protecting dogma than life.

Feb. 4th, 2009

Voices of the Pro-Choice Movement…

Three weeks from today the anti-choice movement will hold protest in 125 cities in 44 states around the nation. This will not go unanswered. Through counter protest, through volunteer client escorting, and through the collective voices of the pro-choice movement we will not allow the anti-choice voices to dominate the discussion.

 

The Coalition for “Life” will be holding a fundraising event on February 19th at the Brazos Valley Exposition Complex; former Arkansas Governor, presidential candidate, and current Fox News contributor Mike Huckabee will be the keynote speaker.

 

Everyone who is pro-choice in Bryan-College Station should show their support for a woman’s right to choose and protest outside the Expo Complex. There will be more information about protesting this event in the coming week.

 

The 40 Days for “Life” protest begins nation-wide on Wednesday, February 25th; there will be a counter protest and there will be more information about the counter protest as the date nears.

 

“Be the change you want to see in the world.”

-Mohandas Gandhi

 

For more information on the pro-choice movement visit 40 Days for Choice, join the 40 Days for Choice on Facebook, or join the [info]40daysforchoice community on Live Journal.


Dec. 3rd, 2008

The Issues We Face: Reproductive Rights

The following is the first installment of a [info]leftofaggieland series: The Issues We Face, an in depth look at the issues that progressive activist will face in the coming year and the coming 111th Congress and 81st Texas Legislature.

 

Reproductive rights will continue to be an important issue and the public debate may intensify in the next year, despite electing a pro-choice President, having Democratic majorities in both the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate, and defeating anti-choice legislation in California, Colorado, and North Dakota. The defeats that the anti-choice movement has been handed this year will galvanize the activist in that movement, even though for the first time in eight years the anti-choice movement will be on the outside looking in.

 

Legislating Choice:

 

There are four bills in the Texas legislature that have been pre-filed that concern reproductive rights. Vince at Capitol Annex reported on the “informed consent” bills that have been filed in both the Texas House and Senate, and pointed to studies that showed the literature that women are subjected to are flawed and have to potential to misinform women:

 

“An analysis of these state-developed materials demonstrates that they do not always measure up to the gold standard of informed consent. Particularly with regard to certain hot-button issues, the information presented is either out-of-date, biased or both. In some cases, the state goes so far as to include information that is patently inaccurate or incomplete, lending credence to the charge that states' abortion counseling mandates are sometimes intended less to inform women about the abortion procedure than to discourage them from seeking abortions altogether.”

 

HB 36, authored by Representative Frank Corte (R-122), was pre-filed last month and would remove the exception of a medical emergency from the current consent law; meaning that even if condition exist that necessitates the immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death the pregnant woman must be subjected to “informed consent.” The bill states that the pregnant woman must be informed of the medical risk of abortion when “medically accurate” including the false claim of the “possibility of increased risk of breast cancer following an induced abortion and the natural protective effect of a completed pregnancy in avoiding breast cancer.”

 

Another bill that was pre-filed in the State Senate is SB 182, authored by Senator Dan Patrick (R-7); the bill is identical to HB 36.

 

Corte also authored HB 44, which would require a pharmacist inform a customer seeking to purchase emergency contraception that it will “prevent the fertilization of an egg; or the implantation of a fertilized egg in the uterus.” This would legalize intimidation of customers seeking a legal contraceptive, like what has recently been reported in an incident at an Oxford, Mississippi Walgreens. Also, businesses which sell emergency contraception would be required to post the following sign:

 

“If you believe that life beings at fertilization – the point where the sperm and egg unite – then you need to know that emergency contraception may either function as a contraceptive to prevent the egg and sperm from uniting or prevent the implantation of your already fertilized egg in your womb. The pharmacist dispensing this drug is required to explain to you how the product may help to prevent your pregnancy.”

 

HB 109, authored by Representative Larry Phillips (R-62), would authorize the Department of Transportation to issue “Choose Life” license plates, and establish a “Choose Life” account to donate money to an eligible organization to “provide counseling, training, advertising, and pregnancy testing.” The organizations that are eligible cannot “provide abortions or abortion-related services or make referrals to abortion providers; is not affiliated with an organization that provides abortions or abortion-related services or makes referrals to abortion providers; and does not contract with an organization that provides abortions or abortion-related services or makes referrals to abortion providers.” This bill is specifically design to support crisis pregnancy centers which studies have shown to be ineffective and offer little or no actual medical services.

 

Public’s View on Abortion:

 

Abortion was not a major issue in this year’s election, in fact social issues where not the wedge issues that they have been in previous elections. According to a Gallup Poll only 13% of those surveyed held the opinion that a candidate must share their opinion on abortion to gain their vote, while 37% felt that abortion was not a major issue and 49% viewed abortion as just one of many important factors. It is likely that the voters that make up the 13% are either steadfastly pro-choice or pro-life, and those groups are on the left and right flanks of both party and do not decide elections.

 

In CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll (Aug. 29-31, 2008) conducted this year 53% of those polls identified themselves as pro-choice while 44% identified themselves as pro-life. However the same poll conducted a year prior found that 45% of those polled identified themselves as pro-choice while 50% identified themselves as pro-life. Whether or not someone identifies themselves as pro-choice or pro-life does not begin to delve into the complexity of the issue. According to a Gallup Poll 40% of Americans view abortion as morally acceptable while 48% percent believe it is moral wrong, which means that whether or not someone self identifies as pro-choice or pro-life does not necessarily correspond to a clear distinction of their view of the morality of abortion.

 

While the views of the public on abortion as a moral issue may be ambiguous, the majority of Americans do share the few that abortion should remain legal. In an ABC News/Washington Post Poll (Aug. 19-22, 2008) 54% of those polled agreed that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while only 18% agreed that abortion should be legal in all cases. In fact over the last twelve years that same poll has found that on average %18.6 of those polled felt that abortion should be legal in all cases. In a Quinnipiac University Poll (July 8-13, 2008) when asked if “in general, do you agree or disagree with the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that established a woman's right to an abortion” 63% of those surveyed agreed.

 

So while much of the public may grapple with the moral implications of abortion and to what extent abortion should be legally made available, the majority of the public believes that abortion should not be made completely illegal.

 

The framing of the abortion debate by the anti-choice movement may change, because the anti-choice movement is driven by the far right conservatives. How the Republican party emerges after the defeats of the last two elections will in part determine the direction that the anti-choice movement takes. If the intellectual conservatives and the moderates in the Republican Party take control of the direction that the GOP it is possible that the anti-choice movement will lose influence and become less of a factor. However, if the ultra conservatives gain control then the wedge issues and the far right fridge elements will push the debate.

 

The shape of the abortion debate and reproductive rights will change in the next year, and it will continue to change as medical and technology advances pose new moral questions. The pro-choice movement must now focus on preventing the eroding of reproductive rights and continue to protect choice. This is the fundamental tenant of the pro-choice movement; the choice should remain.

Sep. 29th, 2008

Live From the Fence

VoicePost Help
184K 0:55
(no transcription available)

Sep. 25th, 2008

From the Fence: Escorting at Planned Parenthood…

Today was the second day of the 40 Days for “Life” campaign, and the first day that Planned Parenthood in Bryan was offering services since the campaign began on Tuesday night.

 

I arrived at Planned Parenthood a little early, a few minutes before 8:30a.m. There was a small group of protesters, and all of them were standing quietly in front of the fence praying. This morning there was three of us volunteering for escort duty; an older man and a younger man and myself. We spent much of the first part of the morning getting to know each other and talking about where we are from and what we do for a living. One of the observations that I have made while escorting is that abortion is rarely the topic of conversation among the volunteers. There were many topics of conversation throughout the day, and conversations were just as likely to be about Barack Obama’s poll numbers as they were to be able the Houston Astros playoff chances.

 

As the morning progressed clients began coming through the gates, and usually two of us would walk up to their cars as they parked and the other would stand by the doors to let them in. There were a few very vocal protesters, vocally but not vulgar. Usually they would start shouting through the fence to the clients, and although it was not vulgar that is not to say they were not spreading misinformation. Most of the clients did not acknowledge them, and I would usually stand between the client and the fence to prevent them from having a clear line of site. I would usually smile and say hello to them. I just tried to project a warm and friendly atmosphere. The older man is actually quite friendly, much friendly than he looks initially. He is rather large and has large hands, and he has quite a full white beard.

 

Some of the clients actually had some funny reactions to the protesters. One client drove into the parking lot and as her and young woman got out of the truck a protester shout out to her and asked her how she was. The client, and older woman with tattoos, shouted back, “Better than you.” Later a young man and a young woman walked out of the clinic to their car and drove to the gate. They had their windows rolled down and a protester came up near their car and tried to speak to them and held out anti-choice literature. The young man in the driver’s seat turned up the rock music loud and then peeled out in front of the protester. That made me laugh.

 

Overall the day was rather quiet, even though we did spend a lot of time walking around the parking lot escorting clients. The protesters were not belligerent or vulgar. However, I know that the protesters make an already less than pleasant experience even less pleasant. Hopefully a smiling face makes it a little better.

Live From the Fence...

VoicePost Help
242K 1:12
“Hey, this is Teddy once again for Left of College Station. I'm am live at Planned Parenthood once again and it has been a relatively quiet but relatively busy day here. There's been some active protesters. A couple protesters have been spending a lot of time shouting at the clients has they have come in to the clinic, but for the most part they haven't said anything that was really, remotely, what's the word...ugly. And the escorts haven't been targeted, so that's been good for us. It's been a interesting day here and it looks like more and more protesters are showing up. I think there is about maybe 6 or 7 protesters outside right now. But that's been a, it's been a quiet day here. So I will blogs more about my experience here later on today.”

Transcribed by: multiple users

Live From the Fence...

VoicePost Help
192K 0:57
“This is Teddy from Left of College Station, Left of Aggieland on LiveJournal and I am posting from Planned Parenthood. I am escorting here. I am a volunteer for Planned Parenthood and I make sure the clients and patients can get into Planned Parenthood for whatever their needs are and hopefully I can prevent them from being harassed by the Protesters of 40 days of Life who would originated from the Collation for Life. Right now there's about 5 or 6 Protesters, most of them are quietly playing. There is one that has been trying to hand out literature and talk to the clients through the fence but for most part it's been a quiet morning. There are three of the volunteers here, myself and two other guys and for most part it's been quiet morning a few clients but I will post another update in about an hour.”

Transcribed by: [info]daemonnoire

Sep. 24th, 2008

Two Sides of the Fence…

Last night the two sides of the abortion debate where separated by a fence.

The Coalition for “Life” (CFL) began its 40 Days for “Life” campaign last night; the CFL Executive Director, Shawn Carney, spoke to a group of anti-choice protesters outside the fence of the Planned Parenthood in Bryan. Inside the fence the Planned Parenthood employees, volunteers, and community supporters gathered together in support of choice.
 
Illuminated by the flashing lights of a Bryan Police Department squad career the anti-choice protesters listened to a speech by Carney. Then they began to sing songs and hold group prayers. They held up signs and had pamphlets in hand. But, to those inside, the night belonged to good conversation and the occasional strong drink.
 
About thirty people were on hand for the counter-protest, which was not as much a protest as it was a gathering of a community. There were ice chests of beer and other assorted adult beverages, and there was plenty of snacks and food. There was even a pro-choice cake.
 
There were people from all different faiths and all different backgrounds. Some people had lived in the area for their entire lives, and some had moved from places from across the state and country. We are not bonded together by a particular faith, but by the idea that life cannot be simplified into one exact moment and that each of our fellow citizens has the right to control their own body.
 
Tomorrow:
From the Fence: Escorting at Planned Parenthood
 
For those on Live Journal: Voice post throughout the morning.

Sep. 23rd, 2008

Unspeakably Precious Things...

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
-First Amendment to the United States Constitution
 
At midnight the Forty Days for Life campaign will begin, and it represents what makes the United States of America a great country.
 
The message or politics of the campaign is not what makes the United States of America a great country, but the simple fact that a group of citizens can gather together in the public square to protest and exercise their right to free speech is was makes this country great. I disagree with everything that the Coalition for Life and the 40 Days for Life campaign stands for, however, I agree with the basic principle that they should be allowed to voice their opinion.
 
Not only do they have the right to voice their opinion, but they have the right to peaceably assemble. It is this right that our constitution protects, that allows them to stand in front of the Planned Parenthood and protest against something that they believe is wrong.
 
To those that protest, thank you for sharing your voice. I will voice my opposition as loudly and as passionately as you will, but I will also stand up for your right voice your opposition to me.
 
I hope that we do not possess the prudence that Mark Twain once said that we have…
 
“It is by the goodness of God that in our country we have those three unspeakably precious things: freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the prudence never to practice either of them. “
 
Tomorrow I will raise my voice once again.

Sep. 22nd, 2008

Reports From the Fence…

Forty Days for “Life” begins in one day. Beginning on Thursday I will be posting regularly about the protest in front of Planned Parenthood. As the protest continue over the next forty days I will continue to post updates, however, beginning next month the focus of the blog will be shifting to the election.

Sep. 15th, 2008

Defending Choice: The Coalition for “Life”…

How the Coalition for Life has targeted Planned Parenthood and uses misinformation and religious beliefs to prevent women access to affordable health care and impede their reproductive rights.
 
In the Brazos Valley there is one organization that has designated itself as the leading anti-choice voice: the Coalition for Life (CFL).
 
During the “40 Days for Life” campaign the CFL ran a television advertisement that was misleading. The commercial claimed that a woman name Holly Patterson died as a result of a visit to Planned Parenthood. Patterson died of an infection in September of 2003 in California after taking prescribed pills for a medication abortion, but the exact cause of Patterson’s death is unknown. Since medication abortions where approved by the FDA in September of 2000 approximately 560,000 medication abortions in the United States have occurred and only six deaths have occurred after the medication abortion (0.001%). However, none of these deaths have been directly attributed to abortion drugs.
 
Also, the same commercial noted that Consumer Reports study ranked Planned Parenthood condoms last in a comparative study of condoms (22nd and 23rd rankings), but it does not note that another Planned Parenthood condom was ranked 14th in the same study. The study used the airburst method instead of the “Gold Standard” water burst method. The commercial states that Planned Parenthood “refuses to take these faulty condoms off the market.” The fact is that Planned Parenthood condoms are FDA approved.
 
The commercial goes on to say that there is “no doctor on sight at their Bryan facilities except for an out of town abortionist.” The Planned Parenthood clinic is staffed with physicians, women’s health nurse practitioners, registered nurses and medical assistants. These are the same people that work in hospitals and clinics, the same people that make up the backbone of the medical community.
 
The CFL is currently running a television advertisement in which they make the claim that Planned Parenthood is unsafe for women and site a Texas Department of Health Services report from 2006. However, what the advertisement fails to mention is that the nature of the report was about paperwork and onsite policies and procedures. These policies and procedures where provided by the Houston Planned Parenthood in a 22 page attachment in the report. More important what the CFL ignores is that the most recent report from the Texas Department of Health Services Planned Parenthood had no deficiencies in any area.
 
The CFL manipulates the statistics about Planned Parenthood, and according to the CFL web site “Planned Parenthood reported doing 264,943 abortions. In the same year, they saw only 12,548 prenatal clients. That means they did 21 abortions for every 1 prenatal visit.” However, the CFL omits the following information: In that same year and from the same report Planned Parenthood saw 14,163 midlife clients, 248 infertility clients and gave 1,040,803 pregnancy tests. The truth is that abortion services represent only 3% of Planned Parenthood services.
 
The CFL describes Planned Parenthood as “about abortion, not choice,” while ignoring all the other services it provides the community. In 2006 Planned Parenthood national statistics show that they tested over 3 million men and women for STD’s including 314,160 HIV tests. In the same year Planned Parenthood provided over 1 million Pap test and almost 900,000 breast exams.
 
The reality is that the Coalition for “Life” does not care about the health of women. Shawn Carney, the CFL Executive Director, is against the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, the first vaccine that can prevent cervical cancer. “If you have to get a vaccine to have sex, you shouldn't be having sex." This despite the facts that 80% of American women will contract HPV by their fiftieth birthday and that world-wide cervical cancer causes 233,000 deaths per year.
 
In 2004 when there was a nationwide shortage of flu shots many local clinics ran out of the vaccine, and while patients were being turned away Planned Parenthood opened its doors and distributed the shot to the older members of the community. According to an article in the Bryan-College Station Eagle the CFL handed out lists of “alternative” health-care providers to clients trying to discourage them from getting the vaccine from PP. The list contained facilities that were no longer giving out the vaccine; CFL did not care about protecting people’s health only about their agenda.
 
The Coalition for “Life” is only interested in promoting a specific interpretation of a religious belief; they are not interested in the health and well being of women. I do not doubt the convictions of their beliefs, and many of those that protest in prayer do so with great respect and vigilance in front of the Planned Parenthood. However, the mission of the CFL is not to promote the health of women or to effectively reduce the amount of abortions; the mission of the CFL is to defeat Planned Parenthood.  

Political and Social Thought...

Sep. 9th, 2008

In Support Of Choice

 
 
There are some very personal reasons that I support a woman's right to choose -- based on her circumstances, her history, and all the factors that go into making such a difficult decision. A lot of it has to do with my own history. And also the difficulties I have seen in the lives of women and children that I have met throughout my legal practice.
 
Let me start with the personal. Technically -- at least by the standard definition of abortion as an induced termination of a pregnancy -- I have had one. It was a medical necessity, due to my life being at risk because of a complication, and one of the most agonizing times of our lives.
 
Let me explain: we had been through several years of fertility agony at that point -- endless tests, poking and prodding, injections -- you name it. Before Thanksgiving that year, I began to experience some nausea and other symptoms of pregnancy, but we had been fooled by that before with no resulting pregnancy, so I was trying not to get my hopes up as I bought yet another pregnancy test two-fer box.
 
We were overjoyed to get a positive result. Beyond joy, in fact, because it was the very first time in our several years of marriage I had gotten pregnant.
 
I called our doc, who worked me in for an emergency appointment, to do a series of blood and other tests, only to face the nightmare of a roller coaster of hormone fluctuations and more testing. By the time we were done with all the ultrasounds and the daily blood tests for over a month, I looked like a heroin addict with palsy -- and we reached the inescapable conclusion that the pregnancy was a danger to my life, and would never become viable.
 
The termination of my first pregnancy occurred on Christmas Eve. It was wretched, miserable and devastating. And it nearly killed me emotionally.
 
My husband was amazing and tender, but nothing -- and I mean nothing -- could fill the void of having to end the only pregnancy I'd ever managed to have. I could feel the watered down methotrexate course through my system as the nurse injected the glowing, green liquid (also used for chemo treatments, as it kills rapidly multiplying cells). I spent the next three days, curled up in a ball with my dachshund, sobbing until I slept fitful dreams of the child we would never have. I can still feel it.
 
Why tell you something so personal? Especially when it is no one's business but ours?
 
Because it is no one's business but ours how we made the decision, what medical issues were at stake, and what choices we made together. Which is the point of choice. No one but the people involved in the individual circumstances can truly know why the decision is made -- to terminate, to keep, to risk.
 
No matter the difficulty, it was the correct medical decision for us. By ending the pregnancy to save my life, and after more fertility hell and miscarriages, I got pregnant with our daughter.
 
I was in the high risk category. We almost lost her at two and a half months, and I spent the remainder of the pregnancy on bed rest or very limited movement. We did a lot of testing and ultrasounds, including a series of scans that told us there was a problem potentially with her brain development -- but they couldn't tell for certain. I spent hours researching the issue online, talking with my doctors and other medical professionals trying to discern what this would mean for our child and for us.
 
There was a substantial risk of severe problems for her, but we chose to have her. We chose to have faith that the scans were merely an anomaly, and that whatever happened, we would love her with everything we had because she was our miracle child.
 
She just started kindergarten last week. And she is thriving and fine. In fact, she's more than fine.
 
Again, we made a choice, based on our own circumstances and what we saw as the best thing to do for us. Choosing to keep your pregnancy is as much as choice as the alternative -- and also a deeply personal one between you, your spouse, your doctors, and whatever conversations with God you may choose to have. Outside of that, it is no one's business, because no one outside of it can possibly know all the agonizing issues involved.
 
Which brings me to my legal experience within the criminal justice and family law systems.
 
Unless you have been around women who have been beaten down and abused (men, too, but for this discussion, since women carry the children, let's stick to them), or children who have been abused physically, emotionally and sexually, whose families struggle with financial despair and potential starvation each and every day of their lives, you can't fully comprehend what kinds of issues may come into play in any individual decision where the circumstances are less than ideal.
 
I'm talking about children who long for the day school starts again so that they can get at least two decent meals a day during the week. Or a 14 year old child who is brutally raped by her father in the middle of the night, only to find weeks later that she is pregnant -- not by her own choosing -- with his child. Imagine having to carry that child to term, when you are a child yourself and forcibly impregnated with your own sister or brother, feeling that child move within you as a reminder every time of your rape -- and then tell me that this mother's life (a child herself) doesn't matter at all, only the potential life within her.
 
I've said this before:
 
...I don't want people to have more abortions. If I could, I'd wave a wand and make all babies be born under ideal circumstances to parents who would love and care for them.
 
But I happen to live in the all-too-real world, where sexual abuse and violent rape and all those other nasty things happen, where children wake up and wonder if there will be any food for them to eat -- right here in the US of A -- and where other things that most people can never even imagine happen within families and neighborhoods and all over the place.
 
And I know enough to know this: I don't speak for God, and neither should anyone else. That's why it is an individual choice -- you make peace with your own soul, your own faith and your own family and friends based on your own, individual and hideous circumstances in each case -- and beyond that, it's no one's business....
 
Now you know why I feel so strongly about this issue. Because I've lived it and because my entire adult life has forced this issue to the forefront. Life is messy and people get caught up in situations that are not of their own making far too often. We never asked for an ectopic pregnancy, but we got one nonetheless. Pro-life folks want you to think that abortion is the only facet of being pro-choice but they could not be more wrong or dishonest.
 
Being pro-choice is to be compassionate and honest about the world around us, and to value the life of the mother just as much as the life within her -- and to trust the women and others involved in each circumstance to weigh all of the issues involved. Because that is what they already do. Most of the women that I have ever known who faced unenviable difficulties in these decisions chose to have their child where it was medically possible. Which is...a choice.
 
Pretending otherwise is simply to lie. And of those who choose to have an abortion, who am I to judge them when I've had to make that choice myself out of medical necessity? There are any number of reasons that I would never, ever choose to have an abortion, but again, that would be my choice. And after reading this, I needed to say that out loud.

Sep. 8th, 2008

Defending Choice: Escorting at Planned Parenthood…

Last week…
 
Last week I called Planned Parenthood and volunteered to escort. So, Monday morning I road my bike up to Planned Parenthood, and met with one of the clinics medical professionals.
 
As I rode up to the clinic I noticed that there were no protesters, which I did not mind at all. I parked my bike outside the door and left my backpack on the handlebars; there is a sign on the clinic door that is a notice not to bring backpacks are bags into the clinic (for obvious security reasons). As I came in through the double doors the clinic did not seem out of the ordinary, it looked like just about any other medical facility I have ever been in. After checking in at the front desk one of the clinics medical professionals came out of the “Staff Only” door and greeted me.
 
The staff member showed me into a room where volunteers sign in on a check-in sheet and where the volunteer vests are kept. After sitting down she asked me a few questions, and then she had several forms that I had to fill out and sign. Some of the forms I filled out where information about myself, and others where forms that protected the privacy of staff and clients. Then the staff member told me what to expect when I escorted, and things to do and things not to do and how to interact with the clients and how not to interact with the protesters.
 
It did not take long to fill out the paperwork, and in about fifteen minutes I was done. My information would be reviewed and after approval I would receive an email regarding what times I could be available for escorting.
 
A week later…
 
I road my bike the nearly three miles to Planned Parenthood, and was greeted by another volunteer but a locked door. Apparently the hours had been changed, so we where both about thirty minutes early. The other volunteer was an older man who is a retired union organizer, since he is retired he usually volunteers to escort during the week. Once the clinics professionals arrived they let us into the building and we signed in on the check-in sheet. Afterwards we put on the bright orange and yellow vest that read “Planned Parenthood Volunteer/Escort.” Then the receptionist gave us key cards so that we could let clients into the building and access the break room.
 
We set up a couple chair outside the entrance and a fan to cool us off, and that fan really works well. For the first thirty minutes we sat and drank coffee and talked, we talked about politics and about his retirement home in another state that he and his wife had built over the last several years. Then around 9:30a.m. clients started to arrive at the clinic.
 
We would wave to them as they pulled into the parking lot and I always flashed a smile, and as they parked their car one of us would walk around to the front of their vehicle. I would wait for them to get out of the car and say hello and good morning, and then I would walk them to the front door. Usually one of us already had the door open for them, or we would open the door and let them in. The retired union organizer told me that sometimes while trying to be friendly he would catch himself asking them how they are doing, but really he tries not to since if they are there for abortion services they are there for something serious and something that is not an easy thing to go through. So, I tried to just be a smiling face, and not ask any questions. I think a smile and a hello go a long way.
 
Sometimes the clients would roll their window down and ask questions, such as if it was alright for them to just come in for birth control (and that is perfectly alright). Some of them asked what I was there for, or if I was there because of the protesters. I would told them I was just there to act as a buffer, but today I was really more of just a smiling face: there was one lone protester. The protester spent the morning usually just standing in front of the fence with a rosary, and on occasion she paced down the sidewalk.
 
I had brought a book with me in case there was any time to read; the retired union organizer told me that some days you could read a few chapters in a book and other days you probably could not read more than a few pages. Today was not a day for reading. However, the retired union organizer managed to carry on a good conversation throughout the morning, pausing to escort people to the doors and then resuming our conversation.
 
It was a relatively uneventful start to my volunteer escorting activities, but I am sure in the future I will have to face much more aggressive protesters than those that stand respectfully by the fence and pray. However, in a way maybe it actually was eventful; if I helped one woman feel a little bit more comfortable coming to the clinic than that is something.
 
Left of College Station Note:
If you are interested in volunteering to escort at Planned Parenthood send me an email and I will be glad to pass along information so that you can wear one of those brightly colored vest.

Sep. 5th, 2008

The Consequences of Losing Choice…

Choice. It is something that all Americans have in many different circumstances. However, there are some who believe that are choices must be limited. There are some who believe that abortion is immoral, and that it should be made completely illegal. However, those that are proponents of eliminating this choice ignore the consequences of losing that choice and ignore the far reaching effects of legislating morality.
 
Currently more than half of the women in the world live in countries in which they have the choice to have an abortion for a variety of social, economic or personal reasons. However, in several countries abortion is illegal, and in many cases abortion has be criminalized and all forms of abortion have been made illegal with no exceptions. This endangers women for a number of reasons. Abortion can be very necessary to protect the health of the mother, and when legal abortion is not available many women will choice to have unsafe abortions that can lead to health problems and sometimes their death.
 
In Roman abortion was criminalize in 1966 by Nicolae Ceauşescu, this was also followed by policies in acted in order to increase population. During this time death from complications during pregnancy increased, as did the amount of illegal abortions. After the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989 and the Romanian Revolution, after which abortion was legalized, the maternal mortality rate (MMR) in Romanian fell. According to the World Health Organization the Romanian MMR was the highest in Europe under the rule of Ceausescu, and between the years of 1990 and 2002 the MMR fell almost 73%.
 
In El Salvador abortion is illegal, and 1998 all exceptions to the abortion laws were removed and in 1999 the El Salvador Constitution was amendment to define life at the moment of conception. Medical professionals in El Salvador are required by law to report women, who have possibly had abortions, and doctor-patient confidentiality is not recognized in this situation and doctors are compelled to report incidents under threat of prosecution. According to the Center for Reproductive Rights after abortion was made illegal in 1998 within two years there were 69 cases involving illegal abortions in El Salvador courts, and in 23 cases women had been turned in by medical professionals. Many of these cases involved the use of clothes hangers, ingesting very high doses of birth control pills, antacids, caustic liquids or cytotec pills.
 
In Nicaragua abortion is illegal, but before 2006 abortion was permitted if three doctors consented that an abortion should be performed for “therapeutic” reasons (the life of the mother was in danger). According to Human Rights Watch at least 80 women died within the first year of the ban because they could not obtain a legal abortion. Nicaragua’s Health Ministry does not keep any official records of the effects of the abortion ban, and has not studied the impact of the ban on the lives and health of women.
 
Because abortion in the United States is legal it can be provided in a safe environment, and can be offered to women safely. According to studies and statistics from the Guttmacher Institute abortions have declined since 2000, and in 2005 1.21 million abortions were performed, and almost ninety percent of these abortions occurred during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, and only 1.1% of abortions have taken place after 21 weeks of pregnancy. The risks from abortions are minimal, less than 0.3% of abortion patients experience a complication that requires hospitalization. Studies and reviews by both the United States and British governments have concluded that there is no association between abortion and breast cancer.
 
The very idea that those that are Pro-Choice are pro-abortion and those that are Pro-Choice are complicit in terminating an independent life is intellectually dishonest. The issue of abortion is one of the most complicated issues, and it is an issue that is colored by shades of gray not by black and white. The debate over when life beings or women someone can be define as alive is and has never been clear, because in life there are rarely true definitive definitions. When does a boy become a man? When does young become old? When does life begin? These are philosophical questions that have been asked for centuries and the answers have been in a constant state of flux. Questions like this must be answered by the individual and from your own moral view point.
 
We must all have the choice, because the consequences of losing that choice impact us all.

Sep. 1st, 2008

Call to Action: Defending Choice…

A woman’s right to choice is increasingly under attack, and those that are anti-choice are making the voices heard more and more and the politicians that are anti-choice are trying to push anti-choice agendas in the legislatures, the courts, and now in this very important general election. If John McCain and Sarah Palin are elected in November the right to choice is over, Roe v. Wade will be overturned, and contraception will be outlawed.
 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has proposed regulations that could seriously undermine access to basic reproductive health services which would include birth control and abortion. There is also the proposed 48th amendment to the Colorado state constitution define a human egg as a "person" from the moment of fertilization.
 
This month the Coalition for Life will begin their “40 Days for Life” campaign, and there advertising campaign attacking Planned Parenthood has already begun. The “40 Days for Life” campaign is scheduled to begin on September 24th and continue to November 2nd (the Sunday before Election Day).
 
Beginning on September 24rd Coalition for Life members will begin intensified protest in front of the Planned Parenthood facilities (those of you that live in the Bryan-College Station may already know that there are small protest daily in front of the Planned Parenthood facilities). These protests will be inundating those people that are utilizing the Planned Parenthood facilities with verbal attacks.
 
To be clear; pro-choice does not equal pro-abortion. I believe that abortion is a tragedy and that there should be fewer abortions, but that abortion should be legal and it should be safe. Pro-life groups are not pro-life but anti-choice, the assertion that somehow those that are pro-choice are somehow against life is insulting.
 
The pro-choice cause needs your voice, and it needs your time. You can volunteer to become an escort at Planned Parenthood and help and protect those that need services from Planned Parenthood against the attacks of the “pro-life.” I have signed up to be a volunteer and will be going through the initial paper work and training on Wednesday. If you are interested in becoming an escort, feel free to email me and I will pass along the information that you need to know.
 
This month Left of College Station is going to be focusing on the abortion debate, examining the claims of anti-choice groups such as the Coalition for Life, and promoting ways of speaking out for choice and women’s rights. September Left of College Station will be defending choice.

Jul. 23rd, 2008

Why Choice Matters, and Why There is Less Choice…

It has been thirty-five years since Roe v. Wade, but the debate still rages. In fact the right to choose has been slowly eroded away ever since that landmark decision. The case against choice was argued by Dallas, Texas District Attorney Henry Wade, the same District Attorney who legacy includes seventeen murder convictions that have been overturned and those accused have exonerated because of prosecutorial misconduct.
 
Now, thirty five-years latter there are an ever growing number of pieces of legislation designed to not only criminalize abortion, but to strip women of their basic rights to health care.
 
A recent ruling in South Dakota has mandated that doctors must tell the patient before the abortion that they “will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique living human being.”
 
The Department of Health and Human Services is attempting to broaden the definitions of abortion to include forms of contraception like birth control pills, emergency contraception and IUDs, and allowing healthcare professionals to refuse to provide contraception to women that may request it.
 
The debate has local connections. The 40 Days for Life campaign was started in the Brazos Valley by the Coalition for Life, and anti-choice organization. The next 40 Days for Life will be taking place from September 24th through November 2nd, ending the Sunday before Election Day.
 
What those that define themselves as “pro-life” do not understand is that those that are Pro-Choice are not pro-abortion. Abortion is a tragedy, and it should be legal and it should be safe.
 
Choice matters because this is not just about abortion, but about the health of women and the right of each citizen to choose what they believe is ethical and responsible.
 
Those that stand in front of the Planned Parenthood on East 29th Street in Bryan, Texas just blocks away from the local Coalition for Life offices only focus on the “unborn.” Anti-choice activist priorities are no the health of women, and not the repercussions on women when abortion is made illegal. They ignore that places like Planned Parenthood are more than abortion clinics but places for health care for women that may not be able to afford it otherwise, and they ignore that medical abortions represent about 3% of its total services.
 
An administration that states that “the best health care decisions are made not by government and insurance companies, but by patients and their doctors,” but then focuses on passing legislation to take the choice away from the patients and their doctors. Not to mention ignoring comprehensive sex education and granting review waivers for grants to states that provide abstinence-only sex education programs that had no effect on the sexual abstinence of youth.
 
This debate is about more than abortion, this debate is about choice and the consequences when choice is restricted, and the ramifications are serious. The sides in this debate are not pro-life and pro-abortion, they are Pro-Choice and anti-choice.

Advertisement

Customize