Home

Advertisement

Customize

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com

Dec. 15th, 2008

The Issues We Face: Death Penalty

The following is the third installment of a [info]leftofaggieland series: The Issues We Face, an in depth look at the issues that progressive activist will face in the coming year and the coming 111th Congress and 81st Texas Legislature.

 

Possibly the most difficult task for progressive activist is continuing the movement to abolish the death penalty, particularly in a state that has executed more people than any other in the United States since 1976. There is a particular urgency to this issue; every battle fought is literally a battle for life and death. Organizations such as the Innocence Project of Texas have worked to save lives; Texas has wrongfully convicted 32 people which is more than any other state in the country.

 

On Friday’s episode of Meet the Bloggers there were several activist and progressive bloggers who discussed the death penalty including Mike Farrell, President of Death Penalty Focus, and Liliana Segura, rights and liberties blogger at AlterNet.org. This discussion ranged from the racial inequality that is present in the justice system to the inhuman and uncivilized nature of the death penalty.

 

The United States has prided itself on being an example for the rest of the world, yet this country is the only developed western nation that has not abolished the death penalty and finds itself in the company of nations that we often point to as the most egregious human rights offenders.  There are four countries that executed more people in 2007 than the United States (42): Pakistan (135), Saudi Arabia (143), Iran (317), and China (470); the United States and those four countries represented 88% of all the executions carried out throughout the world in 2007.

 

Legislation and the Death Penalty

 

State Senator Rodney Ellis (D-6) pre-filed SB 167, which would restrict the use of the death penalty from being carried out on a defendant “who at the time of commission of a capital offense was a person with mental retardation.” Texas has executed nine defendants who where mentally retarded, and there have been 44 defendants who have been executed in the United States that where mentally retarded. The Supreme Court decision on Atkins v. Virginia determined that execution of mentally retarded defendants violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, however the decision did not excluded offenders with severe mental illness. At 25 least defendants with documented diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and other persistent and severe mental illnesses have been executed in Texas.

 

HB 304 was pre-filed by State Representative Harold Dutton (D-142); this legislation would change the “law of parties.” The “law of parties” allows the state to prosecute multiple defendants for the same crime; and essentially allowing the state to seek the death penalty for someone who was party to but did not actually commit a capital crime (similar laws are in place in 24 of 36 American death penalty states). The bill pre-filed by Rep. Dutton would change the law so that a “defendant who is found guilty in a capital felony case only as a party…may not be sentenced to death, and the state may not seek the death penalty in any case in which the defendant’s liability is based solely on that section.” (Section 7.02)

 

Rep. Dutton also pre-filed HB 298, and this bill would restrict the admissibility of certain evidence in capital cases in which the state seeks the death penalty. Testimony of an informant or alleged accomplice the defendant would not be admissible if it is “given in exchange for a grant or promise by the attorney representing the state or by another of immunity from prosecution, reduction of sentence, or any other form of leniency or special treatment.” Also, statements made by the defendant to another person who they where incarcerated with would only be admissible if “corroborated by an electronic recording.”

 

HB 297 would make the three previous bills unnecessary. This bill which has also been pre-filed by Rep. Dutton would abolish the death penalty in Texas. Dutton introduced the same bill in 2007, HB 745, but the bill did not make it out of committee.

 

Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP) has released its annual Report on Death Penalty Developments in 2008, which details capital punishment in Texas over the last year. The report discusses the case of Joe Medellin, a Mexican national who was executed by the state of Texas who ignored a International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling and the pleas of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Texas lawmakers, law professors and religious leaders. Also in the report where reviews of stays of executions, commutations, death sentences, exonerations, U.S. Supreme Court decisions, and legislative developments. The report concluded that the number of executions in Texas declined slightly only because of the de facto national moratorium that existed until April 16th, and that the rate at which Texas executed after that date appeared to “exceed all pervious measures.” However, the report also concluded that the number of new death sentences reached the lowest level in more than thirty years and those juries and prosecutors have continued to use life in prison without the possibility of parole more and more.


 

 

Video Lunch: End the Death Penalty, Mike Farrell on Meet the Bloggers



Nov. 6th, 2008

Death Penalty: Why I Stand in Opposition

The following was a comment posted on Protest: Execution of Elkie Taylor:

 

There is absolutely no reason for you to protest the execution of this scum. The 87 year old man who he and his friend killed with a coat hanger was my Great-Grandfather. Imagine being 4 years old and having just been to his birthday party and then being picked up from school and your mother in tears because someone killed him, just so they could steal his stuff to pawn it for drugs. And then for years watching everyone in your family suffer because the courts are constantly changing their minds about the rulings of this man's fate. Tell me then that you wouldn't want the person responsible to pay for his crime, and all of the pain he caused.

-thedarkroom

 

Standing in opposition to the death penalty is not a position that I have come too lightly, and it is not a position that I have come to without considering the fact that in opposing the death penalty I am defending the rights worst of humanity. However, it is necessary to defend the rights of everyone, even those among us who we have little compassion or empathy for. In fact many times it is those people who need their rights defended the most.

 

It is not that I do not want people to pay for their crimes; I most certainly want criminals who commit heinous crimes to feel the full brunt of the law. However, I do not believe that putting someone to death is an acceptable form of punishment in a civilized society. Mohandas Gandhi said, “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.”

 

The truth is that no one can know for certain what they would want or feel if they were in a similar situation. However, I can say that it would not be improbable for me to desire the death of someone who had murdered one of my own family members. In fact it is hard not to think that I would want anyone who would do harm to any of my family members to feel the pain and suffering that I would wish upon them.

 

That is exactly why we have the law, to protect us from the blinding fire of hatred and vengeance. The law is cold, and it is slow. However, it has to be this way because that is how we are all afforded equal protection under the law. Justice should be swift, but it should never be hasty. We should punish people for their crimes, but that punishment should never be cruel and unusual even if their crimes were.

 

It is the words of this sister of a murder victim, who spoke at the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice hearings on the fairness of the death penalty, that have had the largest impact on my view of the death penalty.

 

“I understand that this sense of revenge is a very legitimate emotion, but it is not a legitimate basis for public policy. And I think that we denigrate our own noble ideals when we use revenge and we use the public fist for the purpose of killing our fellow human beings when that really is not going to solve the problem. It’s certainly not going to bring back the loved ones that people have lost, and I just am amazed that we are still having this conversation in the 21st Century, that we just haven’t gotten smarter about really addressing the causes of crime instead of trying to treat the symptoms.”

 

We shouldn’t measure the strength of our justice system by the severity of our punishments, but on the unyielding protection that it should provide all citizens. We must continue to fight for the rights of those that no one else wants to protect, because if we do not it is our rights that will be taken away next.

 

Taylor’s last words:

"You ain't got to worry about nothing. I am going home. I hope to see all of y'all one day. Lord have mercy on my soul."

 

Elkie Lee Taylor was pronounced dead at 6:30pm this evening.

Protest: Execution of Elkie Taylor

From the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (Brazos Valley Chapter): 

Although national politics has taken a turn, the state of Texas continues down its violent path. Six executions are scheduled for this month, the first today, Thursday, November 06, 2008. If you have a sign, put it back out. If you're able, please join us for our protest at the corner of Texas Ave and Walton from 5:30 - 6:00, we really need some new faces.

 

For more information email Richard Woodward: r-woodward@TCADP-BV.org

 

In the News:

Texas to Execute Ten Men in One Month

Parolee Set for Execution for 1993 Fort Worth Slaying

Aug. 21st, 2008

We Will All Be Murderers on that Day…

Today in Huntsville, Texas Jeff Wood was going to be strapped down, and poison was going to be injected into his body. Today Jeff Wood was going to die because Daniel Reneau shot and killed Kriss Keeran. Jeff Wood’s execution has been postponed, but the basic truth is that Jeff Wood is going to be executed for a murder that he did not commit a murder that was committed by a man that was executed six years ago. On that day we are all murderers.

This case enters the murky waters of the moral justifications of capital punishment, the imperfect justice system that sentences criminals to death, and the public’s overriding emotions of vengeance and apathy.
 
Jeff Wood is guilty of committing a crime. Daniel Reneau and Wood planned and conspired to rob a Kerrville, Texas Goldstar Texaco convenience store in 1996. Before the robbery, Reneau and Wood approached Kriss Keeran and another employee about staging a fake robbery. However, Reneau and Wood made the decision to rob the convenience store after the plan to stage a fake robbery fell through.  During the process of robbing the convenience store of $11,000 in cash and checks Reneau shot and killed Kriss Keeran. Wood’s attorneys have maintained that Wood was not aware that Reneau was armed; also Wood was in a vehicle outside the convenience store during the homicide. Wood is guilty of robbery, but not murder.
 
Despite not committing the murder Wood was sentence to death through the Texas “law of parties,” as law that is in place in 24 of 36 American death penalty states. This law allows for the prosecution of accomplices, and can be interpreted to suggest that the presence of an accomplice can embolden a criminal to kill. The United State Supreme Court has handed down two separate rulings on cases such as this, and in one case has ruled against and in one case has ruled in favor of the same type of law applied in different ways.
 
There are also questions about Wood’s mental health. Wood was initially found by a jury to be mentally incompetent to stand trial, however, after being hospitalized a second jury found Wood to be mentally competent to stand trial. During Wood’s trial he attempted fire his lawyers before the penalty phase, which the judge denied. However, Wood instructed his lawyers not call witnesses and not to cross-examine prosecution witnesses. Recently Wood has communicated to his lawyers that he “believed the trial judge in his case was corrupt but would accept a $100,000 bribe and then deport him to Norway where he could live with his wife” and that “the government will pay him $50,000 a year once he's released and that he's willing to give that money to the judge.”
 
This execution does nothing but create more victims and adds to the anguish that the murder victim’s family has already gone through. According to the Kerrville Daily Times when the store manager was asked about the crime and how he felt about the executions he said “I don’t know how I feel about execution. We’ve already had one death. I don’t know if another death solves the problem.”
 
During the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice hearings on the fairness of the death penalty the sister of a murder victim, spoke out against the death penalty:
 
“I understand that this sense of revenge is a very legitimate emotion, but it is not a legitimate basis for public policy. And I think that we denigrate our own noble ideals when we use revenge and we use the public fist for the purpose of killing our fellow human beings when that really is not going to solve the problem. It’s certainly not going to bring back the loved ones that people have lost, and I just am amazed that we are still having this conversation in the 21st Century, that we just haven’t gotten smarter about really addressing the causes of crime instead of trying to treat the symptoms.”
 

Federal Judge Delays Execution...

Federal Judge Delays Execution of Condemned Inmate
 
 
 

Jun. 12th, 2008

Death Penalty...

The death penalty has become a very important issue to me, although when I consider political candidates their position on the death penalty does not rank high in whether or not I may support or vote for them. Issues like foreign policy, education, and health care are more important to determining who I may or may not support or vote for.
 
During the Texas State Democratic Convention I attended the Democrats Against the Death Penalty Caucus. The thing that struck me the most about this particular meeting was the stories and emotions that were shared, and the stark contrast from what you here from proponents of the death penalty. When people her are for the death penalty speak there is anger and indignation in there voices in their opinions, but when you her people who are against the death penalty speak there is sorrow and empathy in their voices.
 
Reverend Carroll Pickett spoke at length about his experience as chaplain of the death house in Huntsville. After watching 95 men be put to death, Pickett has become a death penalty abolition advocate, and there has been a documentary made about his life: At The Death House Door. To listen to someone who has watched several people be put to death speak about the death penalty is very powerful.
 
The mother of Joseph Nichols, Leeatriss Greenwood, also spoke. Her son was executed last year for the murder committed by Willie Williams under the “law of parties.” She spoke about her ordeal, a journey that has lasted almost three decades. This reminds you that the death penalty creates more victims. Not only are the families of those who are murdered are victimized, but the families of those that are executed for those murders are victimized.
 
The view of most Texans on the death penalty is quite clear: the majority of Texans favor the death penalty.
 
According to the Sam Houston State College of Criminal Justice Survey Research Program the view of the death penalty in Texas has remained relatively constant; with support at 80% in 2001 and at 74% in 2007 (the 6% difference did not transfer to those who opposed the death penalty but rather to the “Don’t Know” category). Although, the overall view of the state justice system has fallen from 67% in 1998 to 48% in 2007.
 
This latest study shows several interesting statistics and you can draw several interest conclusions. Next week I will be sharing some of my conclusions on the statistics on the public opinions of Texans on the death penalty.
 

Jun. 11th, 2008

Death Returns to Texas...

Jun. 3rd, 2008

Death in Texas...

Derrick Sonnier was scheduled to receive a lethal injection today for the murder of Melody Flowers and her two year old son Patrick in 1991. It was scheduled to be the first execution in Texas since September, and comes after U.S. Supreme Court upheld lethal injection as a proper method of capital punishment. Sonnier committed a ferocious and despicable act, but does he deserve to die?
 
The death penalty can at times be one of the hardest things to oppose. How do you argue that a man like Sonnier, who brutally murdered two innocent people, does not deserve to die? The truth is it is important to realize that when you oppose the death penalty you are defending the rights of the worst criminals of our society. Also, despite your opinion on the death penalty, those that have been sentenced to die have committed horrendous acts and have affected friends and families forever. However, it is much more than defending the rights of criminals.
 
The system of capital punishment is a system which can allow for astutely no error. Because it is a system designed to take human lives there can be no room for error, because a system of capital punishment that has any errors will kill innocent people. There have been 129 exonerations in twenty-six different states. If there have been that many mistakes, how reasonable would it be to assume that an innocent person has been executed.
 
One of the arguments for the death penalty is deterrence. Between the years of 1996 and 2006 the national average murder rate fluctuated between 5.5 and 7.4. There are two states that do not have the death penalty, Michigan and Alaska, whose average murder rates where above the national average, and for four of those years Alaska’s murder rate was below the national average. There are twenty states that have the death penalty whose average murder rates where above the national average. If the death penalty deterred murders, then the murder rates for states that have the death penalty should be lowers than those that do not have the death penalty.
 
Murder is committed for one of three reasons, profit, passion, or compulsion. If someone is willing to kill for financial or any other kind of gain then they are usually convinced that they will not be caught. If the motivation for someone to kill is passion then they are killing during a time in which they are not in full use of their senses and are not aware of or do not care about the consequences of their actions. If someone is killing because of compulsion, then they are unable to control their actions despite the consequences.
 
There are also social and economic factors. The percentage of whites executed since 1976 is fifty-seven percent, while the percentage of blacks executed is thirty-four percent, and on death row forty-five percent of inmates are white while forty-two percent of inmates are black. Since 1977, blacks and whites have been the victims of murders in almost equal numbers, yet 80% of the people executed in that period were convicted of murders involving white victims. Who receives the death penalty is determined by several factors, included social status, economic status, and skin color of both the accused and the victim.
 
There are arguments based in religion, particularly in Christianity, used to argue for the death penalty despite many denominations adopting official positions in opposition to the death penalty. The following Christian denominations are proponents of the abolition of the death penalty: American Baptists, Eastern Orthodox Churches, Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church, Methodist Churches, Presbyterian Churches, Roman Catholic Church, Reformed Church in America, and the United Church of Christ.
 
Because humans are self aware and are aware what is happening to their surroundings, the death penalty can never be humane. The threat of death itself is a form of torture. For proponents of lethal injection a study by the medical journal the Lancet in 2005 (The Lancet, Volume 365, Page 1412, April 16, 2005) found that in 43 out of 49 executed inmates studied that there was lower levels of anesthetic than required for surgery. Also, twenty-one of those inmates were found to have levels low enough to suggest awareness. The act of lethal injection does not make death easier for the inmates being executed; lethal injection makes the execution of inmates easier for those performing the execution.
 
Unfortunately, the death penalty is something that the majority of Americans are in favor of, but that does not mean that those that stand in opposition of the death penalty should be discouraged. In a 2007 Gallup poll, sixty-nine percent of Americans supported the death penalty, and for the last two decades the percentage of Americans supporting the death penalty has remained constant. However, that poll also shows that thirty-one percent of Americans are forced to kill against their will.
 
For every human being that we execute a piece of our collective humanity is lost, and killing Derrick Sonnier will do nothing but extinguish another piece of our humanity. There is going to be a day when we discover that we have executed an innocent person. On that day, we will all have something in common with Derrick Sonnier; we will all be murderers.
 
Derrick Sonnier was scheduled to be executed today at 6:00p.m. (Central Time) in Huntsville, Texas, but Sonnier was granted a stay by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for a review of the execution policy.
 
Death Penalty Resources:
 
 
 

Advertisement

Customize