Home

Advertisement

Customize

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com

Jan. 26th, 2009

Local News: Grassroots Politics in Bryan

Petition is an Example of Grassroots Politics

Letter to the Editor – January 26th

 

From the Bryan-College Station Eagle

 

Now that the charter amendment petition submitted to the city of Bryan has been certified as valid, the May 9 election will allow voters the opportunity to set the number of council members needed to place an item on the council agenda at two. More than two negates the concept of single-member districts.

 

Each Bryan resident lives in one of five single-member districts and is represented by the council member from that district. Because Bryan also elects one at-large member, that individual represents every Bryan resident.

 

Any citizen desiring to have a valid issue placed on the council agenda should only have to contact two council members.

 

A special thanks goes to all those who circulated the petition. They gave up many days and evenings walking door-to-door to gather the required signatures. An equal appreciation goes to the more than 1,800 citizens who took their time to listen and then sign the petition.

 

A deep sense of satisfaction should be felt by all those who walked and talked, all those who signed, and also all those who would have signed if we had had enough time to come to their door.

 

This is grassroots politics in action and empowers the average citizen who often feels left out of the process. Kudos to all. Job well done.

 

Karen Hall

Bryan

 

Published Monday, January 26, 2009

Nov. 19th, 2008

Local News: Race and Racism at Baylor

Editorial: Continue Diversity Discussion

 

From the Baylor University Lariat

 

Baylor is slowly trying to mend the racial wounds that were torn wide open on Election Night after a series of events led to a week of investigations, and a conclusion that these incidents were not racially charged.

 

Tensions ran high the day after the election when Baylor's name was splashed across the news after a perceived noose was found hanging from a tree and what were thought to be Obama/Biden signs were said to have been set on fire.

 

Even though these two notorious events are now disproven, there is obviously some racial tension on campus. It's undeniable that racial slurs and hate speech were exchanged between white and black students in front of Penland Hall on Election Night. These exchanges escalated to the point that police had to be called in to deal with the situation.

 

Although the situation is unfortunate and shouldn't have happened, it does shed light on a need to address diversity issues on campus.

 

Sadly, racism has played a major role in the history of the United States; Waco and Baylor are no exception.

 

In 1916, Waco was the site of the "Waco Horror," a brutal torture and lynching of Jesse Washington, a mentally disabled black farmhand who resided in Waco. This happened almost a century ago but is still remembered today.

 

Baylor's history includes a long chapter of racial segregation with only white students being allowed to enroll since it was founded in 1845. It wasn't until January 1964 that the first blacks were allowed to enroll as students at Baylor.

 

Had those four students who were responsible for leaving the rope swing known the history of their university and the very city they live in, they may have thought twice about leaving a rope hanging from a tree. These students should have been more perceptive, not only to the city's history, but also to other minority students who could have interpreted the rope offensively.

 

Baylor is continually becoming more diverse. The student body of more than 14,000 is composed of 28.2 percent of minority students and 71.2 percent of non-minority students, according to the profile of undergraduate students released by the university on Sept. 11. With over a quarter of students being of a minority, the racial tension on Election Night struck a cord.

 

Interim President David E. Garland has fostered a healthy dialogue about the events and diversity. He acted swiftly, denouncing any acts of racism on campus in an e-mail sent out to students on the day after the incidents unfolded. Proper authorities also were brought in to investigate the situation.

 

The true sentiment of the Baylor community were tested and met with actions instead of pacifism. Students have shown that racism has no place on campus and have organized meetings and marches to protest the incidents.

 

Any type of racism is not welcome, especially at a Christian university, but these recent incidents can hopefully help change attitudes and unify a campus that is continually diversifying. The university is home to students from all 50 states and 70 countries. Unfortunately, the sense of security, welcoming and comfort for some students has been damaged.

 

Recent undertakings to address any racial tensions need to continue. Just because the incidents have been resolved this time doesn't mean that the university is finished dealing with race relations.

 

A firm policy against racial acts needs to be enforced so that a firm precedent is set acknowledging that Baylor will not tolerate any acts of racism.

 

The events are a testament of how much work is still yet to be done on campus to promote a loving Christian environment of acceptance and understanding toward others regardless or race.

 

A school with a history of racial segregation is in an especially important position to send a clear message that any type of racism will not be tolerated on campus. The administration's attention to this situation has been appropriate, but this should not be the end of it.

 

Published on Tuesday, November 18, 2008

 

Sep. 5th, 2008

Local Opinions


Letters to the Editor
An Insult to Feminism
 
 
I read with interest Kathleen Parker's column "Palin's critics illustrate shift in feminism" [The Eagle, Sept. 3], which revealed a striking, yet common, lack of historical perspective.
 
As a political movement, feminism has been shifting and changing since it began. It has never been monolithic or stagnant, continually incorporating new and diverse voices into its communities.
 
However, it would be odd for feminism to support policies it views as anti-women or to support political candidates who have the will and the power to enact those policies -- even if that candidate is a woman. Feminists are not obliged to vote for a candidate simply because she is a woman; rather, they support women -- and men -- who continue to support women's issues.
 
I could go on about that, but the most distressing statement in Parker's column is the following: "The greatest achievement of feminism won't be that a woman reached the vice presidency, but that a woman no longer needed feminists to get there."
 
The statement is both insulting and naïve in its lack of regard for those women who blazed the trail that Palin walks today. Who does Parker think made it possible for Palin to have access to higher education? To be able to vote in the first place? To participate in politics at all? To be able to speak publicly? To earn -- and keep -- her own money? To have the choice -- and support -- to balance a career and family? Need I go on?
 
To claim that a woman reached the vice presidency without the feminist vote is different from implying, as Parker does, that a woman could achieve this success without feminists at all. Now that is a jaw-dropping statement.
 
Claire Katz
College Station
 

Advertisement

Customize